tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1663977289289455099.post199481250571712904..comments2021-03-27T13:50:36.768-07:00Comments on diatribes and discourse: A Key QuestionTheThirdWheelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11299446452796373895noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1663977289289455099.post-26504947660310768832011-10-14T12:54:50.148-07:002011-10-14T12:54:50.148-07:00Sorry, that was badly phrased. I was thinking of ...Sorry, that was badly phrased. I was thinking of austerity as a negative number. So in my head I was saying "If you show me that a large decrease in government spending correlates to a large increase in growth", but I could easily be read (as you did) as saying the exact opposite. Will go ahead and clean that up. Don't want to be misunderstood.TheThirdWheelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11299446452796373895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1663977289289455099.post-31658245935661116472011-10-14T12:49:54.866-07:002011-10-14T12:49:54.866-07:00Wait. Your Keynesian stimulus policy note number ...Wait. Your Keynesian stimulus policy note number 1 makes no sense. Keynesianism says greater austerity in recession WILL lead to decreased economic growth. You said that if there is an inverse correlation between austerity and growth, which Keynesianism proposes... you could be convinced Keynesianism is wrong.J Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06599932766931063174noreply@blogger.com